| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Cellular Immunology Laboratory, Institute of Immunology, National University of Ireland Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland
2 Regenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI), National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
3 Viral Immunology Laboratory, School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland
Correspondence
Bernard P. Mahon
bp.mahon{at}nuim.ie
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
) (ten donors), interleukin-10 (IL-10) (eight donors) and interleukin-13 (IL-13) (four donors) responses. Using a series of overlapping peptides derived from the sequence of the VP1 viral capsid protein, a total of 59 candidate T-cell epitopes were identified. Human leukocyte antigen characterization of donors revealed that the population studied included diverse haplotypes, but that at least 17 epitopes were recognized by multiple donors and could be regarded as immunodominant. These data indicate that robust immunological memory to AAV-2 is established. The diversity of sequences recognized suggests that attempts to modify the AAV-2 capsid, as a strategy to avoid confounding immunity, will not be feasible.
These authors contributed equally to this work. 
Present address: Department of Histopathology, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
A supplementary figure, showing verification of the capacity of the IgG subclass ELISA protocol to successfully detect antigen-bound IgG3, and two supplementary tables, listing sequences of the 20-mer peptides derived from the AAV-2 VP1 capsid protein and AAV-2 VP1 capsid sequences recognized by human PBMC, are available with the online version of this paper.
|
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
). The virus consists of a 5 kb single-stranded DNA genome, contained within a non-enveloped icosahedral capsid (Xie et al., 2002). The virus is replication-deficient and requires co-infection with a helper virus such as adenovirus (Ad) or herpes simplex virus (HSV) in order to disseminate (Atchison, 1970; Atchison et al., 1965). Several serotypes of AAV have been investigated for use as gene therapy vectors or recombinant vaccine vehicles (Arruda et al., 2005; High et al., 2004; Kaplitt et al., 2007; Moss et al., 2004, 2007; Yue et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2003). Although AAV-2 has a relatively small transgene cloning capacity (Kremer & Perricaudet, 1995), a number of features make it an attractive gene therapy vector. The virus has an ability to transduce dividing and non-dividing cells across a range of tissue types (Clark et al., 1997; Flotte et al., 1993; Kaplitt et al., 1994; Koeberl et al., 1997) and is capable of defined integration on human chromosome 19, offering the opportunity for stable, controlled transgene expression (Kotin et al., 1990). Finally, AAV-2 is assumed to induce minimal host immune responses, perhaps due to its helper virus dependence. The modest immune responses reported to date have suggested a reduced risk of vector or transduced cell destruction following administration (Zaiss et al., 2002; Zaiss & Muruve, 2005).
The innate immune response to AAV-2 appears to be weak and transient in animal models (Samulski & Giles, 2005; Zaiss et al., 2002). However, little is known about the immune response to AAV-2 infection in humans, beyond the prevalence of infection (Blacklow et al., 1968a, b; Gao et al., 2004). Observation of the adaptive response to AAV-2 in animal models has demonstrated robust primary responses, including specific neutralizing antibody (Halbert et al., 1997; Xiao et al., 1999, 2000). The human antibody response to AAV-2 has been characterized, but seroprevalence varies between 30 and 96 % depending on the population sampled (Chirmule et al., 1999; Erles et al., 1999; Halbert et al., 2006). This broad range might reflect the lack of standardized methods for assessing AAV-2 serology. AAV-2 infection is thought to have occurred in at least 20 % of humans before the age of 10 years (Erles et al., 1999). The detection of AAV DNA in amniotic fluid also suggests that the virus may be present at birth in many humans, possibly due to reactivated latent infection in the mother during pregnancy (Tobiasch et al., 1994).
The cell-mediated adaptive immune response to AAV has received little attention and there has been some assumption that AAV does not provoke a significant response (Büning et al., 2003; Hernandez et al., 1999; Samulski & Giles, 2005; Zaiss & Muruve, 2005). The detection of AAV-2-specific IgM (Erles et al., 1999) might indicate that AAV-2 behaves like a T-cell-independent antigen. However, there is evidence of notable cell-mediated responses to AAV-2 from a recent gene therapy trial which reported declining transgene expression and indications of tissue damage, with concurrent cytotoxic T-cell responses (Manno et al., 2006). Mouse models have since been used to characterize T-cell responses to AAV-2 in greater detail (Chen et al., 2006; Li et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2007). However, inbred mouse strains display limited MHC diversity in comparison with the highly polymorphic human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes, and cell-mediated immunity in mice may not reflect immunity in human populations.
Based on the emerging data on cell-mediated immunity in humans and animal models, it is clear that the cell-mediated response to AAV-2 needs further characterization in the natural host if the virus is to be used confidently in a clinical setting. Thus, to assess the feasibility of repeated use of AAV-2 vectors in human populations, the immune response to AAV-2 was characterized from a panel of 45 human blood donors. A high seroprevalence was observed and this was further characterized by examination of the immunoglobulin subclasses evoked by natural infection. For the first time, to our knowledge, IgG responses were correlated with proliferative cell-mediated responses from the same donors. Furthermore, these were compared with HLA haplotype and an analysis of the profile of cytokine responses induced by AAV-2 stimulation. Finally, a large number of T-cell epitopes were identified on the AAV-2 virus capsid. This study is, to our knowledge, the most complete characterization of the human immune response against AAV-2 to date, examining both arms of the adaptive response. The diversity of stimulatory targets identified on the AAV-2 capsid and the prevalence of the cell-mediated immune response detected undermine the notion that the AAV-2 capsid might easily be modified to avoid cell-mediated immunity.
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
). Isolated PBMCs were resuspended in 8 % (v/v) heat-inactivated FCS/RPMI 1640 medium (cRPMI) (Invitrogen). Blood plasma was isolated from whole blood by centrifugation at 10 000 g for 10 min. Human material was acquired and used in accordance with approval from the local Research Ethics Committee [National University of Ireland (NUI) Maynooth].
Virus preparation.
AAV-2 for immunological assays was provided by the Regenerative Medicine Institute (REMEDI; NUI, Galway) and consisted of an unmodified AAV-2 capsid encasing a modified AAV-2 genome encoding a reporter gene, as previously described (Stender et al., 2007). Virus was purified using an iodixanol density gradient followed by elution through a heparin column. Titres were determined by real-time PCR following DNase1 and proteinase K degradation. Concentrations were expressed as DNase-resistant particles per µl (d.r.p. µl–1). Virus preparations were resuspended in sterile buffer (PBS, 1 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM KCl) and stored at –80 °C. Reagents for vector preparation were sterilized prior to use.
Virus capsid peptides.
The full VP1 sequence incorporates the VP2 and VP3 sequences of the AAV-2 capsid (Xie et al., 2002). A panel of 91 20-mer peptides were synthesized mostly with a 12-mer overlap to adjacent sequences (Supplementary Table S1, available in JGV Online). Peptides were synthesized commercially (Mimotopes) and provided lyophilized. These were reconstituted in 0.1 % (v/v) acetic acid at a concentration of 25 mg ml–1, split into aliquots and stored at –80 °C. Before use, peptides were diluted in PBS to a working concentration of 1 mg ml–1.
AAV-2-specific total IgG ELISA.
Total IgG levels were determined in plasma from donors using an optimized in-house assay. Ninety-six-well microassay plates (Nunc) were coated with AAV-2 at 1x109 d.r.p. ml–1 in carbonate coating buffer (150 mM Na2CO3, 350 mM NaHCO3, pH 9.6) for 12 h at 4 °C. Plates were blocked using 5 % (w/v) sucrose, 1 % (w/v) BSA, 0.05 % (v/v) Tween 20 in PBS. Blood plasma was diluted in 1 % (w/v) skimmed milk powder in PBS and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h before detection of human IgG using a biotinylated anti-human IgG (Sigma-Aldrich). Detection was performed using a streptavidin–horseradish peroxidase conjugate and tetramethyl benzidine substrate. Five washes were performed between each step. In the absence of AAV-2-specific IgG international standards, two donors (22 and 41), previously characterized as reference donors, were selected as representative seronegative and seropositive samples. These samples were included in all assays to allow inter-assay comparison. AAV-2-specific IgG data for the negative reference sample were assigned an AAV-2 antibody titre of 1 unit, whilst the reference seropositive donor was assigned an AAV-2 antibody titre of 10 units. This allowed quality control and normalization of results for meaningful comparison of data between assays. Samples were considered seropositive if they scored above the seronegative cut-off plus two standard deviations.
AAV-2-specific IgG subclass ELISA.
IgG subclass concentrations were determined in plasma samples from 41 AAV-2-IgG-seropositive blood donors. Assays were performed in an adaptation of the protocol for total IgG detection. Plates were probed for human IgG using anti-human IgG subclass-biotin antibodies for subclasses IgG1–IgG4 (Merck). Detection and washing were performed as for the total IgG. To validate these assays in the absence of international reference standards, a series of verification assays were performed using the above detection reagents to detect reference sera with standard concentrations of purified human IgG 1, 2, 3 or 4 (Nordic Laboratories) directly coated to the assay plate. In addition, the detection reagents for IgG1–4 were validated against a similar but unrelated virus (parvovirus B19) prevalent in this population. Representative data for IgG3 are given in Supplementary Fig. S1 (available in JGV Online).
Proliferation assay.
Proliferation in response to AAV-2 restimulation was determined from PBMC cultures isolated from 41 healthy Irish blood donors. Only viable, non-apoptotic PBMC populations were used. Human PBMC (1x106 cells ml–1) were cultured in triplicate with AAV-2 (1x1010 d.r.p. µl–1) or VP1 peptide (40 µg ml–1), cRPMI alone (negative control) or with concanavalin A (Con A) (5 µg ml–1) (positive control). Cultures were incubated at 37 °C, 5 % CO2 for 96 h. After 96 h, 100 µl supernatant was removed from each well and frozen at –20 °C for cytokine analysis. Culture media were then replaced with cRPMI containing 3H-thymidine (92.5 µBq ml–1) and incubated for 5 h, before detection of radioactive incorporation by scintillation counting (Ryan et al., 2007). Results (c.p.m.) were expressed as stimulation indices (SI), calculated as the fold proliferation increase over the negative control (Corcoran et al., 2000). For assays employing VP1 peptides, SI values were considered positive if greater than one standard deviation above the mean SI for stimulated wells.
Definition of T-cell epitopes.
Each VP1 peptide sequence used (Supplementary Table S1) possessed a 12-mer overlap with one upstream and one downstream sequence (except for the terminal peptides), so it was likely that any given epitope would be present in two adjacent peptides. Only responses where two or more adjacent peptides supported positive proliferation were considered to represent a valid epitope. In parallel, a bioinformatics approach was used to predict HLA class I- and class II-restricted epitopes within the AAV-2 VP1 capsid sequence (SYFPEITHI epitope prediction algorithm) (Rammensee et al., 1999). Predicted sequence output sizes were set at 9-mer for class I epitopes and 15-mer for class II epitopes. Due to the large number of sequences generated for each HLA allele, only epitopes with a score of >20 were used for comparison with sequences detected in vitro.
Detection of cytokines.
Cytokine levels were determined in supernatants from 16 PBMC cultures representing samples that supported proliferation in response to AAV-2 stimulation, and where sample abundance allowed analysis. Commercial human gamma interferon (IFN-) and human interleukin (IL)-10 ELISA kits (Immunotools) or matched antibodies for human IL-13 (R&D Systems) were used for cytokine detection, according to the manufacturer's instructions, except for IL-13, where antibody was diluted in carbonate coating buffer to 4 µg ml–1. Cytokine concentrations were determined by comparison with reference standards of known concentration.
Characterization of HLA haplotypes.
HLA haplotypes were characterized for 16 PBMC donors supporting in vitro proliferative responses to AAV-2 stimulation described above. Sequence-specific primer (SSP) PCR for HLA A, B, C, DR and DQ were performed. DNA was isolated from PBMC using a Generation Capture Column kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. HLA A, B, C, DR and DQ were characterized using an SSP-based PCR kit (Texas BioGene) in a split 96-well tray format. Amplified samples were resolved on a 2 % agarose gel and analysed using SSPal HLA analysis software (Texas BioGene) following the manufacturer's protocol.
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
; Erles et al., 1999; Murphy et al., 2009). Therefore, the seroprevalence of AAV-2-specific total IgG was examined in a population of healthy Irish volunteer blood donors. Plasma from 45 donors was assayed for AAV-2-specific IgG by indirect ELISA using in-house reference sera as controls. Donors were considered AAV-2-seropositive if the IgG level was two standard deviations greater than a known seronegative sample. Forty-one of the 45 donors assayed displayed AAV-2-specific IgG above this cut-off and were therefore described as seropositive (Fig. 1a). Using this approach, the mean titre of AAV-2-specific IgG observed in seropositive donors was 9.4±5.2 units.
|
). Significant levels of AAV-2 specific IgG1 were detected in all IgG-positive samples assayed (P
0.05), with a mean concentration of 11.9±6.7 µg ml–1 (Fig. 1b). AAV-2-specific IgG2 was also prevalent and detected in more than 95 % of samples at a similar mean concentration (10.8±7.5 µg ml–1) (Fig. 1c). Interestingly, although AAV-2-specific IgG3 was detected in this donor population, it was uniformly weak (mean concentration 0.7±0.2 µg ml–1) (Fig. 1d) despite strong IgG3 responses to other unrelated antigens (Supplementary Fig. S1). Concentrations of the AAV-2-specific IgG4 were variable (mean 2.5±3.8 µg ml–1) (Fig. 1e). Twelve donors showed no detectable AAV-2-specific IgG4 and only four of the samples (donors 26, 30, 33 and 49) displayed IgG4 concentrations greater than one standard deviation above the mean.
AAV-2 induces a recall cell-mediated response
It has been speculated that AAVs do not elicit significant cell-mediated immune responses (Büning et al., 2003; Hernandez et al., 1999; Samulski & Giles, 2005); however, the detection of a class-switched AAV-2-specific IgG response suggested that T-cell help had been evoked by AAV-2 exposure in the study population. Therefore, the cell-mediated immune response to AAV-2 was examined. PBMC were isolated from the same panel of seropositive donors described above (n=41). These cultures were stimulated in vitro with AAV-2 and assessed for their capacity to support AAV-2-specific proliferation. PBMC from 19 of 41 Irish blood donors sampled displayed significant proliferation in response to restimulation (Fig. 2). It was therefore clear that AAV-2 induced memory responses sufficient to support a recall response to exogenous antigen in a considerable number of donors.
|
, IL-10 and IL-13, cytokines characteristic of polarized CD4+ T helper cell recall responses. Ten cultures (donors 13, 15, 27, 31, 32, 38, 40, 41, 50 and 51) produced significantly increased IFN- (P0.05) (Fig. 3a and Table 1). Cultures from four donors (27, 31, 32 and 46) showed increased IL-13 (Fig. 3b); whereas increased IL-10 was present in eight cultures (donors 31, 38, 40, 43, 45, 47, 50 and 51; mean concentration 140 pg ml–1) (Fig. 3c, Table 1). Although no clear polarization of cytokine responses was seen in this population, the detection of IFN-, IL-10 or IL-13 in recall responses suggested that long-lived CD4+ T-cell responses were evoked by AAV-2 in at least some of the study population.
|
|
(donors 13, 15, 16, 19, 27, 31, 32, 38, 40, 41, 43, 45, 46, 47, 50 and 51) were stimulated with overlapping 20-mer peptides corresponding to the complete protein sequence of VP1. The sequence for VP1 contains the full sequence of the alternative capsid proteins VP2 and VP3, thus stimulation of PBMCs with overlapping peptides from VP1 allowed identification of stimulatory epitopes across the entire AAV-2 capsid sequence. Cultures were assessed for proliferation in response to these antigens (Fig. 4). A stringent definition of an epitope was chosen; only stimulating pairs of adjacent 20-mer sequences from more than one donor were considered to represent an antigenic sequence recognized by T cells, with the 12-mer consensus sequence overlap assumed to contain the T-cell epitope. A total of 17 consensus sequences were identified that were recognized by two or more donors. These 17 common antigenic sequences (Table 2, labelled epitopes A–Q) were identified across a total of six donors. All of the sequences identified showed greater than 85 % homology with high-scored HLA class I- and class II-restricted VP1 epitopes predicted by bioinformatics. A further 42 unique candidate epitopes were identified that were recognized by single donors only (Supplementary Table S2, available in JGV Online).
|
|
and 4). As expected, the donors characterized displayed considerable haplotype diversity. No obvious correlations between HLA expression and epitope recognition were detectable in a population of this size; however, the key observation from this study was that donors of different HLA haplotypes (Tables 3 and 4) recognized at least 16 epitopes, indicating that certain regions of the AAV-2 capsid are recognized promiscuously and may be reasonably considered immunodominant.
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
and IL-13 production were detected. Fifty-nine candidate T-cell epitopes were identified within the VP1 capsid sequence. Seventeen epitopes were identified on the VP1 protein of AAV-2 which were recognized by more than one donor; no significant correlation between stimulating epitope and respondent donor HLA haplotype was observed, suggesting that these represent promiscuously recognized immunodominant epitopes. This study, to our knowledge, represents the most detailed combined examination of cell-mediated and humoral immunity to AAV-2 in humans to date. This study demonstrates that both humoral and cell-mediated memory for AAV-2 is prevalent in the Irish population, supporting the hypothesis that immunity will complicate the use of AAV-2 in therapy. Capsid modification strategies are unlikely to be a practical solution due to the variety of epitopes recognized; however, screening for patient cell-mediated and humoral responses may be an invaluable tool in bringing effective AAV-2 vectors to clinical use.
Given the known prevalence of AAV-2 infection in humans (Chirmule et al., 1999; Erles et al., 1999; Halbert et al., 2006), it is conceivable that widespread humoral memory for the virus might negatively affect the usefulness of the virus as a gene therapy vector. In this study, 41 of 45 donors studied displayed significant titres of AAV-2-specific IgG in blood plasma (Fig. 1). Although this is the largest study to examine both humoral and cell-mediated responses to AAV-2 in the same population, a sample of 45 donors is still small and larger studies in populations with greater genetic diversity would be beneficial. Nevertheless, a seroprevalence greater than 90 % is high when compared with AAV-2 seroprevalence data obtained in other European studies but similar when compared with populations from the USA (Chirmule et al., 1999). As no AAV-2-specific IgG standards exist and as there is no standardized method for assaying AAV-2 antibody, it is likely that the variability observed between studies is as much a result of differing methods as it is of geographical differences and population demographics. An urgent need exists to develop reference standards for AAV serology; currently it is difficult to compare titres between studies in a quantitative way.
In this study, AAV-2-specific IgG consisted primarily of IgG1 and IgG2, with low levels of IgG3 and variable levels of IgG4 present in all donors (Fig. 1). The presence of IgG1 (Fig. 1b) was expected, as this subclass is commonly induced following viral infections such as measles, hepatitis B, human T-lymphotrophic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and rubella (Franssila et al., 1996; Gregorek et al., 2000; Lal et al., 1993; Thomas & Morgan-Capner, 1988; Toptygina et al., 2005). IgG1 is also induced by B19V which, like AAV-2, is a member of the parvoviridae (Franssila et al., 1996). IgG2 was also a major constituent of the AAV-2-specific antibody response, comprising an average 42 % of total IgG (Fig. 1c). The proportions of AAV-2-specific IgG1 and IgG2 detected in this study broadly agree with data recently reported by Murphy et al. (2009). Whilst IgG2 is a component of serological responses to measles and HTLV-1, it is notable that it is not a significant component of the response to the parvovirus B19V (Franssila et al., 1996; Lal et al., 1993; Toptygina et al., 2005). This suggests that there are differences between how the immune response develops against B19V and AAV-2, perhaps reflecting the requirement of AAV for a helper virus to disseminate.
The IgG3 subclass is usually a significant component of virus-induced IgG, typically comprising 12–50 % of circulating virus-specific IgG for measles, rubella, HTLV-1 and hepatitis B in seropositive individuals (Gregorek et al., 2000; Kalvenes et al., 1996; Lal et al., 1993; Toptygina et al., 2005). Although AAV-2-specific IgG3 was detected in all seropositive donors characterized, this subclass constituted an average of just 2.6 % (0.7±0.2 µg ml–1) of the total AAV-2-specific IgG detected (Fig. 1d and Table 1). Given the robust humoral response induced by AAV-2, low levels of IgG3 are surprising but supported by observation of similar levels from a recent study from the USA (Murphy et al., 2009). The average concentration of virus-specific IgG3 (0.6 µg ml–1) observed in that study was similar to our observations; however, we did not observe any case where IgG3 represented more than 6 % of total AAV-2-specific IgG from any donor examined (Table 1). The difference between the results reported by Murphy et al. (2009) and those reported here may reflect differences in population genetic background, or the prevalence and nature of various helper virus infections.
The low seroprevalence of IgG3 against AAV-2 deserves further attention. Recognition of a particulate antigen in the inductive immune sites of the upper respiratory tract typically produces a higher proportion of IgG3-producing B cells than recognition in the circulatory system (Jefferis & Kumararatne, 1990). Given that the route of natural AAV-2 infection is oral/respiratory tract (Blacklow et al., 1968a; Gould & Favorov, 2003; Rabinowitz & Samulski, 2000), the failure of AAV-2 to induce significant IgG3 in any donor examined here is unexpected. It might be that AAV-2 has some capacity to evade or subvert strong IgG3 induction, which would represent a means of evading the complement cascade. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that the classical complement pathway is only induced weakly by high titres of AAV-2 and the alternative complement pathway is not activated (Zaiss et al., 2008). As IgG3 is the primary IgG subclass involved in the recruitment of C1, an initiator of the classical complement pathway, the lack of IgG3 induction observed in this study may explain results from previous studies (Zaiss et al., 2008). A weak IgG3 response has also been observed against B19V, where virus-specific IgG3 levels are high in early infection but decline significantly over time (Corcoran et al., 2000; Franssila et al., 1996).
AAV-2-specific IgG4 represented less than 10 % of total IgG and levels were variable (2.5±3.8 µg ml–1) (Fig. 1e). In comparison with the serology of other viruses, variable IgG4 levels are perhaps unremarkable. Hepatitis B infection and vaccination typically induce little IgG4, but levels increase post-infection or vaccination. Variable titres of IgG4 are also seen in B19V infection, and typically this is not observed until some 200 days post-infection (Franssila et al., 1996). IgG4 is a feature of the response to HTLV-1 and measles (Lal et al., 1993; Toptygina et al., 2005). If the temporal characteristics of AAV-2 serology mirror those of parvovirus B19V, the minimal IgG3 and elevated IgG4 levels detected here may be representative of late convalescent AAV-2 infections. As IgG3 and IgG4 levels are an indicator of the stage of convalescence in B19V infection (Franssila et al., 1996), further examination of the temporal characteristics of IgG3 and IgG4 induction in AAV-2 infection might be useful.
Few studies have examined human cell-mediated immune responses to AAV-2 (Chirmule et al., 1999; Manno et al., 2006). This study demonstrated that AAV-2 evokes robust proliferative and cytokine recall responses detectable from PBMC cultures. Of the 41 donors examined, 19 demonstrated a statistically significant proliferative response to stimulation with AAV-2 (Fig. 2). Chirmule et al. (1999) also examined human PBMC proliferation in response to AAV-2 but found that only 3 of 57 of their subjects produced a stimulation index greater than 2.0. This discrepancy may be due to the relatively low concentration of AAV-2 used for the restimulation in that study (m.o.i. of 100, compared with 10 000 here).
The cytokine profiles evoked by AAV-2 did not exhibit consistent Th1 or Th2 polarization in this study. IFN- was the most frequently detected cytokine (Fig. 3a), indicating that, in some subjects, AAV-2 evokes a Th1-like response. IL-13, an indicator of Th2 responses, was only detected from weakly proliferating cultures (SI between 1.5 and 3) (Fig. 3b) whereas IL-10 production was detected across a range of donors (Fig. 3c). Chirmule et al. (1999) also examined AAV-2-stimulated PBMC cultures for cytokines, finding IFN- and IL-10 in 6 and 12 % of the cultures, but these authors examined IL-4 instead of IL-13, failing to find the cytokine in any culture.
The AAV-2 capsid is composed of three proteins: VP1, VP2 and VP3 in a ratio of 1 : 1 : 20 (Xie et al., 2002). VP2 and VP3 are products of the splicing of VP1 mRNA and both proteins represent a sub-sequence of the VP1 protein. Using a conservative definition, 17 epitopes were identified as recognized on the capsid of AAV-2 VP1 (Table 2). A further 42 sequences were recognized by a single donor each (Supplementary Table S2). Limitations in assay sensitivity and the conservative epitope definition employed mean that it is likely that more epitopes are recognized than defined in this study.
The panel of epitopes identified herein includes some sequences (Supplementary Table S2) previously identified in human and mouse studies (Chen et al., 2006; Manno et al., 2006; Sabatino et al., 2005). The RDSLVNPGPAMA and EIQYTSNYNKSV sequences recognized by donor 13 were similar to sequences identified in C57BL/6 mice (Sabatino et al., 2005). The sequence GFRPKRLNFKLF recognized by donor 16 shares an 11 aa identity with a 15-mer sequence identified in BALB/c mice (Sabatino et al., 2005). Likewise, the sequence VPQYGYLTL identified as an epitope in BALB/c mice (Sabatino et al., 2005) as well as in a single human case by Manno et al. (2006) lies within the sequence VFMVPQYGYLTL identified as a candidate epitope for donor 16. Furthermore, Chen et al. (2006) identified an immunogenic sequence TSADNNNSEYSWTGA in mice which spans two sequences recognized by donor 50 (SKTSADNNNSEY and NSEYSWTGATKY).
The panel of 17 epitopes recognized by two or more donors in this study have not been previously identified in human or animal models, with two exceptions. Chen et al. (2006) identified the sequence QVSVEIEWELQKENS in mice, and this sequence shares 11 aa with the candidate epitope EIEWELQKENSK (sequence C, Table 2) recognized by three donors (13, 50 and 51) in this study. The second sequence, FKLFNIQV (sequence K, Table 2), was recognized by donors 16 and 50 and is homologous to a sequence identified in mice by Sabatino et al. (2005). Sequences B and C were each recognized by three donors, whilst sequence A was recognized by four. One limitation of the approach employed to identify these sequences was the peptide of only 12 residues, a size that would not be optimal for defining class II-restricted epitopes. Furthermore, the definition used here to delineate T-cell epitopes was stringent. Therefore, the present study has probably underestimated the number of T-cell epitopes for AAV-2 recognized by the study population. Despite these limitations, the number of epitopes identified highlights both the prevalence and diversity of T-cell memory for AAV-2 in the study population.
It was not possible to identify a correlation between donor HLA haplotype and the corresponding epitopes recognized in this study. Now that a large number of epitopes of AAV-2 have been identified, it would be valuable in future to use a larger sample size and include approaches to assign particular epitopes to specific HLA alleles. The haplotypes of AAV-2 responding donors did display diversity (Table 3). This was also the case for donors responding to the most common stimulating capsid sequences (Table 4). It is reported here that the DQ2, DQ3 [DQ7(3), DQ8(3), DQ9(3)] and DQ6(1) serotype alleles were present at high frequencies in our study group. These results agree with recent detailed examinations of HLA allele frequencies and haplotypes in the Irish population (Dunne et al., 2008). The observation that a number of AAV-2 sequences can be recognized by donors with different HLA haplotypes, and indeed across species, indicates that the epitopes described in Table 2 might reasonably be considered to be immunodominant human T-cell epitopes.
It is intriguing that recent reports have indicated successful therapeutic use of AAV via the subretinal route (Hauswirth et al., 2008) whilst intravenous and intramuscular administrations have been less successful (Brantly et al., 2006; Manno et al., 2006). The prevalence of humoral and cell-mediated immunological memory for AAV-2 demonstrated here is likely to contribute to the failure of intravenous and intramuscular administration. Such limitations might not apply to antigen encountered via the eye; it is well known that powerful immunosuppressive effects can be induced when antigen is introduced to the ocular anterior chamber leading to the phenomenon of anterior-chamber-associated immune deviation (Streilein, 2003). It may be that a subretinal route for AAV gene therapies induce such phenomena and avoid confounding immunological memory.
It has been suggested that AAV-2 capsid modification enhances the efficacy of the virus as a vector (Monahan & Samulski, 2000) or that immunosuppressive drugs following vector administration prevent cell-mediated immunity (Manno et al., 2006). However, systemic immunosuppression may be undesirable in candidates for gene therapy and thus the immunodominant sequences identified here may thus represent appropriate targets for capsid modification in rare cases. Nevertheless, our observation that even a small sample of an outbred population can support diverse recall response against multiple T-cell epitopes means that genetic modification of AAV-2 to escape immune recognition by T cells fully is not a feasible goal. Vector capsid modification to remove identified epitopes might instead represent a strategy reserved for specific cases in which administration of immunosuppressive drugs is undesirable. Serology did not reliably predict the quality of T-cell memory for AAV-2 (Table 1). Thus, detailed combined screening of patient antibody and T-cell epitope recognition would be valuable tools in such cases.
|
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTINTRODUCTIONMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONREFERENCES |
|---|
Atchison, R. W. (1970). The role of herpesviruses in adenovirus-associated virus replication in vitro. Virology 42, 155–162.[CrossRef][Medline]
Atchison, R. W., Casto, B. C. & Hammon, W. M. (1965). Adenovirus-associated defective virus particles. Science 149, 754–756.
Blacklow, N. R., Hoggan, M. D., Kapikian, A. Z., Austin, J. B. & Rowe, W. P. (1968a). Epidemiology of adenovirus-associated virus infection in a nursery population. Am J Epidemiol 88, 368–378.
Blacklow, N. R., Hoggan, M. D. & Rowe, W. P. (1968b). Serologic evidence for human infection with adenovirus-associated viruses. J Natl Cancer Inst 40, 319–327.[Medline]
Brantly, M. L., Spencer, L. T., Humphries, M., Conlon, T. J., Spencer, C. T., Poirier, A., Garlington, W., Baker, D., Song, S. & other authors (2006). Phase I trial of intramuscular injection of a recombinant adeno-associated virus serotype 2 
1-antitrypsin (AAT) vector in AAT-deficient adults. Hum Gene Ther 17, 1177–1186.[CrossRef][Medline]
Büning, H., Ried, M. U., Perabo, L., Gerner, F. M., Huttner, N. A., Enssle, J. & Hallek, M. (2003). Receptor targeting of adeno-associated virus vectors. Gene Ther 10, 1142–1151.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chen, J., Wu, Q., Yang, P., Hsu, H. C. & Mountz, J. D. (2006). Determination of specific CD4 and CD8 T cell epitopes after AAV2- and AAV8-hF.IX gene therapy. Mol Ther 13, 260–269.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chirmule, N., Propert, K. J., Magosin, S. A., Qian, Y., Qian, R. & Wilson, J. M. (1999). Immune responses to adenovirus and adeno-associated virus in humans. Gene Ther 6, 1574–1583.[CrossRef][Medline]
Clark, K. R., Sferra, T. J. & Johnson, P. R. (1997). Recombinant adeno-associated viral vectors mediate long-term transgene expression in muscle. Hum Gene Ther 8, 659–669.[Medline]
Corcoran, A., Doyle, S., Waldron, D., Nicholson, A. & Mahon, B. P. (2000). Impaired gamma interferon responses against parvovirus B19 by recently infected children. J Virol 74, 9903–9910.
Dunne, C., Crowley, J., Hagan, R., Rooney, G. & Lawlor, E. (2008). HLA-A, B, Cw, DRB1, DQB1 and DPB1 alleles and haplotypes in the genetically homogenous Irish population. Int J Immunogenet 35, 295–302.[CrossRef][Medline]
Erles, K., Sebökovà, P. & Schlehofer, J. R. (1999). Update on the prevalence of serum antibodies (IgG and IgM) to adeno-associated virus (AAV). J Med Virol 59, 406–411.[CrossRef][Medline]
Flotte, T. R., Afione, S. A., Solow, R., Drumm, M. L., Markakis, D., Guggino, W. B., Zeitlin, P. L. & Carter, B. J. (1993). Expression of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator from a novel adeno-associated virus promoter. J Biol Chem 268, 3781–3790.
Franssila, R., Söderlund, M., Brown, C. S., Spaan, W. J. M., Seppälä, I. & Hedman, K. (1996). IgG subclass response to human parvovirus B19 infection. Clin Diagn Virol 6, 41–49.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gao, G., Vandenberghe, L. H., Alvira, M. R., Lu, Y., Calcedo, R., Zhou, X. & Wilson, J. M. (2004). Clades of adeno-associated viruses are widely disseminated in human tissues. J Virol 78, 6381–6388.
Gould, D. J. & Favorov, P. (2003). Vectors for the treatment of autoimmune disease. Gene Ther 10, 912–927.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gregorek, H., Madalinski, K., Woynarowski, M., Mikolajewicz, J., Syczewska, M. & Socha, J. (2000). The IgG subclass profile of anti-HBs response in vaccinated children and children seroconverted after natural infection. Vaccine 18, 1210–1217.[CrossRef][Medline]
Halbert, C. L., Standaert, T. A., Aitken, M. L., Alexander, I. E., Russell, D. W. & Miller, A. D. (1997). Transduction by adeno-associated virus vectors in the rabbit airway: efficiency, persistence and readministration. J Virol 71, 5932–5941.[Abstract]
Halbert, C. L., Miller, A. D., McNamara, S., Emerson, J., Gibson, R. L., Ramsey, B. & Aitken, M. L. (2006). Prevalence of neutralizing antibodies against adeno-associated virus (AAV) types 2, 5, and 6 in cystic fibrosis and normal populations: implications for gene therapy using AAV vectors. Hum Gene Ther 17, 440–447.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hauswirth, W. W., Aleman, T. S., Kaushal, S., Cideciyan, A. V., Schwartz, S. B., Wang, L., Conlon, T. J., Boye, S. L., Flotte, T. R. & other authors (2008). Treatment of leber congenital amaurosis due to RPE65 mutations by occular subretinal injection of adeno-associated virus gene vector: short-term results of a phase I trial. Hum Gene Ther 19, 979–990.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hernandez, Y. J., Wang, J., Kearns, W. G., Loiler, S., Poirier, A. & Flotte, T. R. (1999). Latent adeno-associated virus infection elicits humoral but not cell-mediated immune responses in a nonhuman primate model. J Virol 73, 8549–8558.
High, K. A., Manno, C. S., Sabatino, D., Hutchison, S., Dake, M., Razavi, M., Kaye, R., Aruda, V., Herzog, R. & other authors (2004). Immune responses to AAV and to factor IX in a phase I study of AAV-mediated, liver-directed gene transfer for hemophilia B. Mol Ther 9, S383–S384.
Jefferis, R. & Kumararatne, D. S. (1990). Selective IgG subclass deficiency: quantification and clinical relevance. Clin Exp Immunol 81, 357–367.[Medline]
Kalvenes, M. B., Kalland, K. H. & Haukenes, G. (1996). Immunoglobulin G subclass antibodies to rubella virus in chronic liver disease, acute rubella and healthy controls. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 13, 43–50.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kaplitt, M. G., Leone, P., Samulski, R. J., Xiao, X., Pfaff, D. W., O'Malley, K. L. & During, M. J. (1994). Long-term gene expression and phenotypic correction using adeno-associated virus vectors in the mammalian brain. Nat Genet 8, 148–154.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kaplitt, M. G., Feigin, A., Tang, C., Fitzsimons, H. L., Mattis, P., Lawlor, P. A., Bland, R. J., Young, D., Strybing, K. & other authors (2007). Safety and tolerability of gene therapy with an adeno-associated virus (AAV) borne GAD gene for Parkinson's disease: an open label, phase I trial. Lancet 369, 2097–2105.[CrossRef][Medline]
Koeberl, D. D., Alexander, I. E., Halbert, C. L., Russell, D. W. & Miller, A. D. (1997). Persistent expression of human clotting factor IX from mouse liver after intravenous injection of adeno-associated virus vectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94, 1426–1431.
Kotin, R. M., Siniscalco, M., Samulski, R. J., Zhu, X. D., Hunter, L., Laughlin, C. A., McLaughlin, S., Muzyczka, N., Rocchi, M. & Berns, K. I. (1990). Site-specific integration by adeno-associated virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87, 2211–2215.
Kremer, E. J. & Perricaudet, M. (1995). Adenovirus and adeno-associated virus mediated gene transfer. Br Med Bull 51, 31–44.
Lal, R. B., Buckner, C., Khabbaz, R. F., Kaplan, J. E., Reyes, G., Hadlock, K., Lipka, J., Foung, S. K. H., Chan, L. & Coligan, J. E. (1993). Isotypic and IgG subclass restriction of the humoral immune responses to human T-lymphotropic virus type-I. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 67, 40–49.[CrossRef][Medline]
Li, H., Murphy, S. L., Giles-Davis, W., Edmonson, S., Xiang, Z., Li, Y., Lasaro, M., High, K. A. & Ertl, H. C. (2007). Pre-existing AAV capsid-specific CD8+ T cells are unable to eliminate AAV-transduced hepatocytes. Mol Ther 15, 792–800.[Medline]
Manno, C. S., Pierce, G., Arruda, V. R., Glader, B., Ragni, M., Rasko, J. J., Ozelo, M. C., Hoots, K., Blatt, P. & other authors (2006). Successful transduction of liver in hemophilia by AAV-factor IX and limitations imposed by the host immune response. Nat Med 12, 342–347.[CrossRef][Medline]
Monahan, P. E. & Samulski, R. J. (2000). AAV vectors: is clinical success on the horizon? Gene Ther 7, 24–30.[CrossRef][Medline]
Moss, R. B., Rodman, D., Spencer, L. T., Aitken, M. L., Zeitlin, P. L., Waltz, D. A., Milla, C., Brody, A. S., Clancy, J. P. & other authors (2004). Repeated adeno-associated virus serotype 2 aerosol-mediated cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator gene transfer to the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Chest 125, 509–521.[CrossRef][Medline]
Moss, R. B., Milla, C., Colombo, J., Accurso, F., Zeitlin, P. L., Clancy, J. P., Spencer, L. T., Pilewski, J., Waltz, D. A. & other authors (2007). Repeated aerosolized AAV-CFTR for treatment of cystic fibrosis: a randomized placebo-controlled phase 2B trial. Hum Gene Ther 18, 726–732.[CrossRef][Medline]
Murphy, S. L., Li, H., Mingozzi, F., Sabatino, D. E., Hui, D. J., Edmonson, S. A. & High, K. A. (2009). Diverse IgG subclass responses to adeno-associated virus infection and vector administration. J Med Virol 81, 65–74.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rabinowitz, J. E. & Samulski, R. J. (2000). Building a better vector: the manipulation of AAV virions. Virology 278, 301–308.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rammensee, H.-G., Bachmann, J., Emmerich, N. P. N., Bachor, O. A. & Stevanovi
, S. (1999). SYFPEITHI: database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs. Immunogenetics 50, 213–219.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ryan, M., Murphy, G., Ryan, E., Nilsson, L., Shackley, F., Grothefors, L., Øymar, K., Miller, E., Storsacter, J. & Mills, K. H. G. (1998). Distinct Th cell subtypes induced with whole cell and acellular pertussis vaccines in children. Immunology 93, 1–10.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ryan, J. M., Barry, F., Murphy, J. M. & Mahon, B. P. (2007). Interferon- does not break, but promotes the immunosuppressive capacity of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Clin Exp Immunol 149, 353–363.[Medline]
Sabatino, D. E., Mingozzi, F., Hui, D. J., Chen, H., Colosi, P., Ertl, H. C. J. & High, K. A. (2005). Identification of mouse AAV capsid-specific CD8+ T cell epitopes. Mol Ther 12, 1023–1033.[CrossRef][Medline]
Samulski, R. J. & Giles, J. (2005). Adeno-associated viral vectors for clinical gene therapy in the brain. In Principles of Molecular Neurosurgery, vol. 18, pp. 154–168. Edited by A. Freese, F. A. Simeone, P. Leone & C. Janson. Basel: Karger.
Stender, S., Murphy, M., O'Brien, T., Stengaard, C., Ulrich-Vinther, M., Søballe, K. & Barry, F. (2007). Adeno-associated viral vector transduction of human mesenchymal stem cells. Eur Cell Mater 13, 93–99.[Medline]
Streilein, J. W. (2003). Ocular immune privilege: therapeutic opportunities from an experiment of nature. Nat Rev Immunol 3, 879–889.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thomas, H. I. J. & Morgan-Capner, P. (1988). Rubella-specific IgG subclass concentrations in sera using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): the effect of different sources of rubella antigen. Epidemiol Infect 101, 599–604.[Medline]
Tobiasch, E., Rabreau, M., Geletneky, K., Laruë-Charlus, S., Severin, F., Becker, N. & Schlehofer, J. (1994). Detection of adeno-associated virus DNA in human genital tissue and in material from spontaneous abortion. J Med Virol 44, 215–222.[Medline]
Toptygina, A. P., Pukhalsky, A. L. & Alioshkin, V. A. (2005). Immunoglobulin G subclass profile of antimeasles response in vaccinated children and in adults with measles history. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 12, 845–847.[Medline]
Wang, L., Figueredo, J., Calcedo, R., Lin, J. & Wilson, J. M. (2007). Cross-presentation of adeno-associated virus serotype 2 capsids activates cytotoxic T cells but does not render hepatocytes effective cytolytic targets. Hum Gene Ther 18, 185–194.[CrossRef][Medline]
Xiao, W., Chirmule, N., Berta, S. C., McCullough, B., Gao, G. & Wilson, J. M. (1999). Gene therapy vectors based on adeno-associated virus type 1. J Virol 73, 3994–4003.
Xiao, W., Chirmule, N., Schnell, M. A., Tazelaar, J., Hughes, J. V. & Wilson, J. M. (2000). Route of administration determines induction of T-cell-independent humoral responses to adeno-associated virus vectors. Mol Ther 1, 323–329.[CrossRef][Medline]
Xie, Q., Bu, W., Bhatia, S., Hare, J., Somasundaram, T., Azzi, A. & Chapman, M. S. (2002). The atomic structure of adeno-associated virus (AAV-2), a vector for human gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99, 10405–10410.
Yue, Y., Ghosh, A., Long, C., Bostick, B., Smith, B. F., Kornegay, J. N. & Duan, D. (2008). A single intravenous injection of adeno-associated virus serotype-9 leads to whole body skeletal muscle transduction in dogs. Mol Ther 16, 1944–1952.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zaiss, A. K. & Muruve, D. A. (2005). Immune responses to adeno-associated virus vectors. Curr Gene Ther 5, 323–331.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zaiss, A. K., Liu, Q., Bowen, G. P., Wong, N. C. W., Bartlett, J. S. & Muruve, D. A. (2002). Differential activation of innate immune responses by adenovirus and adeno-associated virus vectors. J Virol 76, 4580–4590.
Zaiss, A. K., Cotter, M. J., White, L. R., Clark, S. A., Wong, N. C. W., Holers, V. M., Bartlett, J. S. & Muruve, D. A. (2008). Complement is an essential component of the immune response to adeno-associated virus vectors. J Virol 82, 2727–2740.
Zhang, J., Wu, X., Qin, C., Qi, J., Ma, S., Zhang, H., Kong, Q., Chen, D., Ba, D. & He, W. (2003). A novel recombinant adeno-associated virus vaccine reduces behavioural impairment and β-amyloid plaques in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Dis 14, 365–379.[CrossRef][Medline]
Received 8 June 2009;
accepted 28 July 2009.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL | MICROBIOLOGY | J GEN VIROL |
| J MED MICROBIOL | ALL SGM JOURNALS | |
1.5 (dashed line) with a significance of P
